Whatever happened to aiming for the best waste management option?
If it’s easier to do, then it’s the thing to do. If the job can be done faster by cutting corners, go for it. If it’s the cheapest option, buy two. Somewhere along the path of societal evolution, easiest-fastest-cheapest has become synonymous with best. This linguistic transmogrification is so pervasive, society no longer takes notice of its shortsighted slide down a spiraling path toward all things inferior.
When did easiest-fastest-cheapest become synonyms for best? When did we stop aiming for the best waste management choices and settle for inferior?
There are good, affordable options out there that can strengthen/support recycling mandates and result in better waste management systems. But progress toward zero waste is s-l-o-w and too many communities are still stuck in their comfortable ruts.
Progressive leadership looks to the future, ever-steering its constituency toward that proverbial “brighter tomorrow.” For waste management, that horizon does not include landfills or incinerators. But it does include high-rate industrial composting … if public and private facility owners aim for the best and not the cheapest.
What are the best options for biodegradable wastes, the best organics collection strategies, the best composting technologies, the best facility designs, the best uses for compost products – who asks these questions before plunging head first into a development project?
Or, if someone asks the questions, do they really mean what’s the cheapest technology, design, and collection strategy?
As for the resulting compost product, is the real objective to put it to highest and best use or to get rid of the stuff as easy and as fast as possible?
‘Best use’ is hard to achieve with an inferior product
Stormwater management, erosion control, carbon sequestration, turfgrass management, landscaping – these rank among the best uses for compost products.
They represent markets that place high dollar value on stable, quality soil amendments with no odor, high organic matter content, macro and micro nutrients, and other characteristics linked to a high-performance product that can be safely used by anyone, anywhere, at any time.
Poor quality compost cannot meet this minimum standard. For the most part, its sale and distribution is restricted to low-dollar markets like farming and landfill cover.
The catch here is that, when managing mixed organic wastes, it usually requires a combination of the best facility designs, composting technologies, and management protocols to produce a really good compost product.
To achieve top quality, keep product moving out the gate, and ensure the highest possible revenue stream, a facility owner must match those aspirations with a high-quality manufacturing process and competent management that includes a professional sales effort.
Shortsighted strategies won’t meet long-term goals
Many communities are waking up to the fact that their long-range plan needs to include a viable strategy for organic waste management that keeps biodegradable materials – especially, food waste – out of landfills and incinerators.
Composting certainly fits the bill, and it’s often possible to modify an existing yard waste windrow permit to include other organics.
But what happens a few years down the road when that one load of food waste per week turns into a load per day, and then two loads per day, and then 10 loads per day?
When the entire city is source-separating organics curbside, and the vast majority of those garbage trucks are headed for that crowded, outdoor windrow composting facility, what happens then?
Historically, facility owners (public and private) can struggle through years of banned feedstocks, failed lab reports, public complaints, unsellable product, fines, and/or legal fees before finally facing the facts. Their antiquated composting system simply isn’t up to the challenge of today’s urban waste streams … and their bargain basement facility wasn’t such a bargain after all.
Successful high-volume processing of urban streams that include highly putrescible materials and biodegradable plastics requires tight environmental control and a high-rate composting process.
If a facility owner wants to process in the least amount of space, taking the least amount of time, using the most reliable, predictable process, then that owner is going to convert that lesser system to the best system for mixed urban organics. A covered and/or encapsulated aerated static pile (ASP) system, preferably with computerized control/monitoring and biofiltration, meets those expectations.
But how much might that region or business have saved/earned by investing in an expandable, high-rate facility in the beginning? Remember, we’re not just talking composting, but all the dollars saved associated with compost use, too.
While Nero fiddled, Rome burned
Fiddling about while the city buries itself under a mountain of garbage is not an example of good governance. In the private sector, failing to invest in upgrades and new technologies sets a company up for obsolescence.
Both depict outcomes resulting from failure to act when the time is right.
Unlike even 10 or 15 years ago, when most people were clueless about the many benefits of organics recycling on a municipal/industrial scale, today’s taxpayers are aware of composting as a waste management strategy.
Large volume waste generators in the private sector have been using commercial composting services for decades for one reason only – it’s more cost-effective than landfills. As a bonus, it also gives corporations green points to use in their marketing messages.
Is it right for governing boards to continue to expect taxpayers to pay more simply because those who made the decision failed to be proactive in their decision-making?
No single option will be right for every community. But giving serious consideration to organics recycling is always the right thing to do.
Starting at the top and working down is a lot easier than trying to claw one’s way up from the bottom. So, aim for the best solution first, even if it’s not the easiest, fastest, or cheapest option.
Then, use easy-er, fast-er, cheap-er tweaks to mold that system into the perfect waste management approach, customized to meet the unique needs and expectations of each community or business.